Tuesday, May 3, 2011

redefining a single ruby method on a single instance with a lambda

In Ruby, is there a way to redefine a method of a particular instance of a class using a proc? For example:

class Foo
  def bar()
    return "hello"
  end
end

x = Foo.new
y = Foo.new

(Something like):

y.method(:bar) = lambda { return "goodbye" }

x.bar
y.bar

Producing:

hello
goodbye

Thanks.

From stackoverflow
  • def define_singleton_method_by_proc(obj, name, block)
      metaclass = class << obj; self; end
      metaclass.send(:define_method, name, block)
    end
    p = proc { "foobar!" }
    define_singleton_method_by_proc(y, :bar, p)
    

    or, if you want to monkey-patch Object to make it easy

    class Object
      # note that this method is already defined in Ruby 1.9
      def define_singleton_method(name, callable = nil, &block)
        block ||= callable
        metaclass = class << self; self; end
        metaclass.send(:define_method, name, block)
      end
    end
    
    p = proc { "foobar!" }
    y.define_singleton_method(:bar, p)
    #or
    y.define_singleton_method(:bar) do
       "foobar!"
    end
    

    or, if you want to define your proc inline, this may be more readable

    class << y
      define_method(:bar, proc { "foobar!" })
    end
    

    or,

    class << y
      define_method(:bar) { "foobar!" }
    end
    

    this is the most readable, but probably doesn't fit your needs

    def y.bar
      "goodbye"
    end
    

    This question is highly related

  • You can use the syntax class <<object to get an object's "singleton class" (that's a special parent class belonging only to that object) and define methods only for that instance. For example:

    str1 = "Hello"
    str2 = "Foo"
    
    class <<str1
      def to_spanish
        'Hola'
      end
    end
    

    Now if you do str1.to_spanish, it will return "Hola", but str2.to_spanish will give you a NoMethodFound exception.

    John Douthat : if he has an externally defined proc in a simple variable, it's difficult to get it into the new scope created by class<

0 comments:

Post a Comment