I have been trying to learn more about lambda expressions lately, and thought of a interesting exercise...
is there a way to simplify a c++ integration function like this:
// Integral Function
double integrate(double a, double b, double (*f)(double))
{
double sum = 0.0;
// Evaluate integral{a,b} f(x) dx
for(int n = 0 ; n <= 100; ++n)
{
double x = a + n*(b-a)/100.0;
sum += (*f)(x) * (b-a)/101.0;
}
return sum;
}
by using c# and lambda expressions?
From stackoverflow
-
What about this:
public double Integrate(double a,double b, Func<double, double> f) { double sum = 0.0; for (int n = 0; n <= 100; ++n) { double x = a + n * (b - a) / 100.0; sum += f(x) * (b - a) / 101.0; } return sum; }Test:
Func<double, double> fun = x => Math.Pow(x,2); double result = Integrate(0, 10, fun);Marc Gravell : hehe - within seconds of each other ;-p -
The real power comes, as stated, when calling it. For example, in C#
static double Integrate(double a, double b, Func<double, double> func) { double sum = 0.0; // Evaluate integral{a,b} f(x) dx for(int n = 0 ; n <= 100; ++n) { double x = a + n*(b-a)/100.0; sum += func(x) * (b - a) / 101.0; } return sum; }Then:
double value = Integrate(1,2,x=>x*x); // yields 2.335 // expect C+(x^3)/3, i.e. 8/3-1/3=7/3=2.33... -
Lambda Powa! Not sure whether this is right (No C# programmer! Just liking its lambda stuff)
(a, b, c) => { double sum = 0.0; Func<double, double> dox = (x) => a + x*(b-a)/100.0; // Evaluate integral{a,b} f(x) dx for(int n = 0 ; n <= 100; ++n) sum += c(dox(n)) * (b-a)/101.0; return sum; }Ok, so i think while the code is C++, why not keep it C++ and get lambda in? Here it is how it looks for c++0x, being hopefully released as a Standard very soon :
static double Integrate(double a, double b, function<double(double)> f) { double sum = 0.0; // Evaluate integral{a,b} f(x) dx for(int n = 0; n < 100; ++n) { double x = a + n * (b - a) / 100.0; sum += f(x) * (b - a) / 101.0; } return sum; } int main() { Integrate(0, 1, [](double a) { return a * a; }); }
0 comments:
Post a Comment